Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to simoneskildsen.com

Simon Eskildsen · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
100match
sirupsen.com
Simon Eskildsen
1 shared topicsdatabases
69match
simonislam.com
Simon Islam
1 shared topicsdatabases
64match
simonvreugdenhil.com
Simon Vreugdenhil | Home
1 shared topicsdatabases
62match
eblaquery.com
EblaQuery — Premium Analytical Tools & Calculation Engines
1 shared topicsdatabases
62match
multiscrape.com
Data Mining Services | multiscrape.com
1 shared topicsdatabases
62match
bynarcomputing.com
Bynar Computing | Data & Application Engineering
1 shared topicsdatabases
62match
bynarcomputing.net
Bynar Computing | Data & Application Engineering
1 shared topicsdatabases
62match
angov.org
Atanas Angov – Personal Blog
1 shared topicsdatabases
62match
redataproapi.com
RedataPro API Tester
1 shared topicsdatabases
62match
th-inc.com
THinc - Peter Thawley's Site for Personal and Professional Stuff
1 shared topicsdatabases
62match
pagesilo.app
PageSilo — Turn Browsing Into Structured Data
1 shared topicsdatabases
62match
registream.com
RegiStream: Infrastructure for Register Data Research
1 shared topicsdatabases
62match
relevantlogic.com
Guyren Howe | Data, Policy & Systems
1 shared topicsdatabases
62match
addressbookdb.com
Addressbook on Database - Addressbook
1 shared topicsdatabases
62match
data-craft.co.uk 🇬🇧
Datacraft Homepage
1 shared topicsdatabases
61match
butlercs.com
Butler Computer Systems - Database design, programming, and consulting - specializing in Microsoft Access and iPhone Development
1 shared topicsdatabases
61match
lsmvec.com
Asteroid — Memory-Friendly Vector Database
1 shared topicsdatabases
61match
allmydata.co.uk 🇬🇧
All My Data
1 shared topicsdatabases

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.