Piperic
similar sites
‹ profileTools

Sites similar to simondsfordelegate.com

Shelly Simonds for Delegate · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
mollyformd.com
Molly McKee-Seabrook for Delegate
2 shared topicspolitics
70match
baxterennis.com
⋆ Baxter Ennis for Delegate ⋆
2 shared topicselections
70match
dixon4md.com
Spencer Dixon - Democrat for Delegate
2 shared topicspolitics
69match
angelachainer.com
Angela Chainer For House of Delegates - District 56
2 shared topicselections
67match
angelaforall.com
Angela Angel | Maryland House of Delegates District 25
2 shared topicselections
67match
antoinethompson.com
Antoine M. Thompson for Maryland State Delegate District 25
2 shared topicspolitics
66match
herbjonesforvirginia.com
Herb Jones for Congress
2 shared topicspolitics
65match
isaiahforkansas.com
Isaiah Harris for Kansas
2 shared topicselections
65match
campaignfordemocracy.com
Gavin Newsom's Campaign for Democracy
2 shared topicspolitics
65match
supervisormoreda.com
Shelina Moreda for Supervisor
2 shared topicselections
65match
supervisorshelina.com
Shelina Moreda for Supervisor
2 shared topicselections
65match
shawnnasilvius.com
Why Silvius for Mayor
2 shared topicselections
65match
shelleymoorecapito.com
Shelley Moore Capito for U.S. Senate
2 shared topicspolitics
65match
esheforatlanta.com
HOME | Elect Eshe Collins for ATL | Atlanta, GA
2 shared topicselections
65match
gatesfortexas.com
Gary Gates | Gates For Texas House
2 shared topicspolitics
65match
maggieford7.com
Maggie St Jean for District 7
2 shared topicselections
65match
shellyjan.com
Home - Shelly Jan - BC Conservative Party
2 shared topicselections
64match
californians4us.com
Home - Californians for U.S.
2 shared topicselections

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.