Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to simidickson.com

Simi Dickson - Software Developer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
81match
devryanchoi.com
DevRyan - Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
ankacakan.com
Anka Cakan - Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
gokcearda.com
Arda Gökçe - Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
bettjustus.com
Bett Justus - Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
pawanjoshi.com
Pawan Joshi - Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
denizekiz.com
Deniz Ekiz - Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
chintey.com
Chintey · Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
alamdev.tech
Alam | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
pavanbangera.com
Pavan Bangera - Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
simionbruda.com
Simion Bruda | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
anaghkanungo.com
Anagh Kanungo - Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
anmolagrawal.dev
Anmol Agrawal - Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
patelkiran.dev
Kiran Patel - Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
devbysergio.com
DbS · Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
devlevi.com
Levi C. | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
igawaclawska.com
Iga Waclawska - Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
manuelgutierrez.com
Manuel Gutierrez - Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
andriyviychuk.com
Andriy Viychuk - Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.