Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to simantaparida.com

Simanta Parida · Senior Product Designer · Consumer & SaaS · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
77match
loridyer.com
Lori Dyer — Senior Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
76match
lucianrus.com
Senior Product Designer | Homepage
1 shared topicsdesign
76match
luanbr.com
Luan — Senior Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
75match
luchoaranceta.com
Lucho Aranceta — Senior Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
75match
brucevang.com
Bruce Vang | Senior Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
75match
juliascucuglia.com
Júlia Scucuglia — Senior Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
75match
reinaldoferdie.com
Ferdie Reinaldo – Senior Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
74match
courtneyeisenhuth.com
Courtney Eisenhuth — Senior Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
74match
akproductdesign.com
Allison Kuehn - Senior Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
74match
ani-mccurnin.com
Ani McCurnin - Senior Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
74match
juliapostnova.com
Senior Product Designer for Complex SaaS Products
1 shared topicsdesign
74match
lucasnp.com
Lucas Paraizo · Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
74match
brunnen.digital
Product Designer & Leader
1 shared topicsdesign
74match
jtremain.com
Jason Cross | Senior Product Designer Portfolio (UX/UI)
1 shared topicsdesign
74match
terrenceokafor.com
Terrence Okafor — Senior Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
74match
julietopp.com
Julie Topp · Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
74match
justinkwak.com
Justin Kwak · Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign
74match
burstingattheseams.com
Tim Shannon | Senior UX/Product Designer
1 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.