Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to silkegroth.de

Home - Schreiben_und_Träumen · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
maxieschreiber.com
Maxie Schreiber
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
adinakocht.com
adinakocht | schreiben + kochen + reisen
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
peterdorn.com
DENKEN SPRECHEN SCHREIBEN I außergewöhnliche Bücher
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
paco-bay.de 🇩🇪
Home - Paco Bay
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
neva-verlag.com
Home - Neva Verlag
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
martina-liel.com
Home - scotlandmyloves Webseite!
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
probibi.de 🇩🇪
Home - probibi
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
olivereck.de 🇩🇪
- Home - Impressum
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
one-vision-ahead.de 🇩🇪
Home - TOEPPERVISIONEN.COM
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
anneweiss.net
Home - Anne Weiss
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
piggybooks.de 🇩🇪
Home - Piggybooks
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
ares-verlag.com
Home - Ares Verlag
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
project-gutenberg.de 🇩🇪
Home - Projekt Gutenberg
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
profisellerdiebjeck.de 🇩🇪
Home - E-Book-Wunder
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
bibliopolium.net
Home - Bibliopolium
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
armin-lissfeld.com
Home - Armin Lissfeld
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
abbrederis.net
Hier schreibt - A. Abbrederis-Simpson
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
persoenlichebuecher.com
Home - Persönliche Bücher
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.