similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to siliconcompiler.com

Siliconcompiler alternatives & similar sites

SiliconCompiler — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Programming Languages →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
avinash.dev ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Compiling Thoughts	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
zplang.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Zplang - The Intuitive Trading Language	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
drakon.tech ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	DrakonTech	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bashmatic.dev ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	BashMatic - BASH/DSL helpers for the rest of us.	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
plat4mproject.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	FAQ \| Plat4m	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ballerinalang.org ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	The Ballerina programming language	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
joprocket.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	JOP_ROCKET \| This framework enables user to discover JOP gagdets and can automate building a complete JOP chain to bypass DEP. JOP ROCKET is the ultimate solution for Windows jump-oriented programming. JOP ROCKET also finds the novel two-gadget dispatcher, which greatly expands what is possible with	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
diffcompare.org ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Diff Compare - Compare & Sort Keys	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
syncular.dev ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Syncular — Local-first sync framework	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
basilisk-python.dev ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Basilisk — Open-Source, PEP-Conformant Python Language Server	en	programming-languages	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
azoralang.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Azora. A language designed for building fast and safe.	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lualpm.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	lde	en	software-and-applications	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
pocopine.dev ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	pocopine — a full-stack Rust application framework	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
abstraction-systems.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Abstraction Systems - Components and Programming Tools for .NET (Windows Forms, C#, VB.NET, J#)	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
pjrmi.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	GitHub - deshaw/pjrmi: PJRmi is an API for performing Remote Method Invocation (RMI, aka RPC) in a Java process from a Python one. · GitHub	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
swiftmock.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	SwiftMock - Automated Mock Generation for Swift Protocols	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
avalanche.io ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	C4 — Universal Content Identification	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
diffchecker.dev ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Diff Checker - Compare Two Texts Online \| Text Compare	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.