Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to silexdev.com

Silex Dev · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
c11k.com
C11K Development
1 shared topicsweb-development
71match
rebelidealist.com
Austin, TX Ruby on Rails, iOS, and Android Apps Development | Rebel Idealist
1 shared topicsweb-development
69match
bstaxx.com
Bstaxx - Web Application Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
reecelim.dev
Reece Lim | Web Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
hizkia.dev
Hizkia Felix Winata | hizkia.dev
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
lucaszielinski.com
Lucas Zielinski - Développeur Full Stack
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
3pxls.com
Home - 3PXLS
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
ademolajoshua.dev
Ademola Dev
1 shared topicsweb-development
67match
atthawut.com
Atthawut Smith | Frontend Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
67match
byrhys.dev
Rhys | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
67match
asyncdev.com
ASYNC DEVELOPMENT
1 shared topicsweb-development
67match
atifrc.com
Atif Chaudhry | Indie Page
1 shared topicsweb-development
67match
andywebb.digital
Freelance Ruby on Rails and JavaScript Contractor and HTML5 MVP and Web App Developer in Leeds, UK
1 shared topicsweb-development
67match
500tech.com
Professional Front-End Development Agency - 500Tech
1 shared topicsweb-development
67match
mediaone.ie 🇮🇪
MediaOne | Home
1 shared topicsweb-development
67match
bsevendev.com
B7 Dev
1 shared topicsweb-development
67match
eisbell.dev
Erin Isbell - Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
66match
alexsteeves.dev
Alex Steeves
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.