similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to silentrobots.com

Willis Vandevanter · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

2 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

2 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

Profile | Echo_Slow

2 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

Abrahack's Blog

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

Bug Bounty Platform

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

byresearchers.net

2 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

buildingsecops.com

Building SecOps

2 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

pablo-bravo.com

Pablo Bravo's Corner

2 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

2 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

Achievoz - Cybersecurity and Technology from A to Z

2 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

0xmaruf — Security Researcher & Bug Bounty Hunter

2 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

0xdeadbeef.info

0xdeadbeef dot info | raptor's labs

2 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

Simon Koeck | Security Researcher & Developer

2 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

2 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

OJ's Perspective · OJ Reeves

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

2 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

2 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.