Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to silasglen.com

Silas Glen | The Afflicted Scientist · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
67match
absolutenano.com
United Science
1 shared topicsscience
67match
analyticalsciencenetwork.co.uk 🇬🇧
ASN | The Analytical Science Network
1 shared topicsscience
66match
reekoscience.com
Home - Reeko's Mad Scientist Lab
1 shared topicsscience
66match
corscientia.com
corscientia | Connected science, made playful
1 shared topicsscience
66match
labtech.co.uk 🇬🇧
Serving Scientists - Labtech
1 shared topicsscience
66match
paleocave.com
Paleocave Blog | Trust us, we're scientists
1 shared topicsscience
65match
simonscientific.com
Simon Scientific
1 shared topicsscience
65match
efarhan.com
Farhan Mustafa — Atmospheric Scientist
1 shared topicsscience
65match
acceleratingscience.com
Accelerating Science Blog | Thermo Fisher Scientific
1 shared topicsscience
65match
julianquandt.com
Julian Quandt | Senior Scientist & Postdoc
1 shared topicsscience
65match
btyoungscientist.com
Stripe Young Scientist & Technology Exhibition | 2026
1 shared topicsscience
65match
simul-europe.com
Simul Europe ePosters | The future of scientific posters, today.
1 shared topicsscience
65match
theemergingscience.com
The Emerging Science | The Emerging Science
1 shared topicsscience
65match
oxfordsp.com
The Oxford Science Park
1 shared topicsscience
64match
acvys.org
ACVYS 2025 – The 11th Annual Conference of Vietnamese Young Scientists
1 shared topicsscience
64match
advancedsciencesacademics.com
Advanced Sciences Academics
1 shared topicsscience
64match
pablojimeno.com
Home | The Origin
1 shared topicsscience
64match
academic-survey.org
Scientific Surveys
1 shared topicsscience

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.