Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to siebertverlag.de

SIEBERT VERLAG · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
74match
prego-cookbookstore.de 🇩🇪
ZS Verlag
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
neva-verlag.com
Home - Neva Verlag
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
reinhardt-medien.de 🇩🇪
Friedrich Reinhardt Verlag
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
ares-verlag.com
Home - Ares Verlag
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
profilverlag.de 🇩🇪
Home: Profil Verlag
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
riva-store.de 🇩🇪
riva | Münchner Verlagsgruppe
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
a-verlag.com
A-Verlag - Home
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
ritterbooks.com
Ritterverlag |
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
proiecta-verlag.de 🇩🇪
proiecta Verlag: Start
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
periplaneta-verlag.de 🇩🇪
Periplaneta - Verlag und Medien
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
iskopress.com
Home - iskopress Verlag
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
plusknauss-verlag.de 🇩🇪
+KNAUSS Verlag – Home
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
orient-und-okzident.de 🇩🇪
Der Verlag Orient & Okzident
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
pepyrus.de 🇩🇪
ULLSTEIN Buchverlage
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
rediscover-brandenburg.de 🇩🇪
Startseite – Ammian Verlag
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
grosswiele.com
Therese Grosswiele Verlag
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
thiele-verlag.com
Startseite - Thiele Verlag
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
thieleverlag.com
Startseite - Thiele Verlag
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.