Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to sieber-engineering.ch

itSieber – Schweizer IT, Hosting & Software – Sieber Engineering AG · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
98match
it-sieber.com
itSieber – Schweizer IT, Hosting & Software – Sieber Engineering AG
13 co-citations9 shared tech2 shared categorycloud-computing
30match
kanzlei-software.com
Kanzleisoftware Beratung zu RA-MICRO, ActaPort, Cloud, Online, Hosting, beA - Kanzleisoftware Beratung zu RA-MICRO, Cloud, Online, beA, Hosting
5 shared tech2 shared categorysoftware-and-applications
28match
metaways.com
Willkommen - metaways.de
4 shared tech2 shared categoryweb-hosting
28match
ao-hosting.net
Willkommen - metaways.de
4 shared tech2 shared categoryweb-hosting
28match
profilstahl.at 🇦🇹
Austgate - Hosting, Domains & IT aus Österreich
4 shared tech2 shared categoryweb-hosting
28match
professional-tuning.at 🇦🇹
Austgate - Hosting, Domains & IT aus Österreich
4 shared tech2 shared categoryweb-hosting
28match
servicenetwork.at 🇦🇹
Austgate - Hosting, Domains & IT aus Österreich
4 shared tech2 shared categoryweb-hosting
28match
software-defined-network.at 🇦🇹
Austgate - Hosting, Domains & IT aus Österreich
4 shared tech2 shared categoryweb-hosting
27match
hr-hosting.com
HR-Hosting UG (haftungsbeschränkt)
2 shared tech2 shared categoryweb-hosting
27match
peaknetworks.ch 🇨🇭
peaknetworks | Hosting - Domain - Cloud - Schweiz
2 shared tech2 shared categoryweb-hosting
26match
mainfrankenpark.com
Home - rockenstein AG - Internet-Service-Provider
2 shared tech2 shared categoryweb-hosting
25match
peaknetworks.at 🇦🇹
peaknetworks | Cloud-Lösungen und Hosting in Deutschland
2 shared tech2 shared categoryweb-hosting

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.