Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to sidntrivedi.com

Home • Siddhant N Trivedi · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
movermeyer.com
Hello, I'm Michael
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
andrewmarkle.com
Andrew Markle · Andrew Markle
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
andrewtatham.com
Andrew Tatham
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
abenezer.org
Abenezer Belachew / Software Developer
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
jwlangford.com
Jesse Langford
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
albertlatacz.com
Making software happen…
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
silascandiolli.com
I'm Silas Candiolli… – Java, Software Development, tools and career
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
cosycoding.com
Cosycoding | I write about my journey as software developer.
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
andywhittle.dev
Andy Whittle
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
7dub.dev
Matyáš Sedmidubský
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
juliano-alves.com
Juliano Alves
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
simonrahnasto.com
Simon Rahnasto | Online CV
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
pembrokesoftware.co.uk 🇬🇧
Pembroke Software
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
jrrom.com
jrrom - Home
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
bugfreejs.com
Home - Bugfree Programming
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
hojjatk.com
This Developer's Planet
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
lornaparry.com
Lorna Parry Student Software Engineer
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
abdel.me
Home | Abdel
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.