Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to sidneyw.com

All posts | Sidney Wijngaarde · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
juancarlos.io
All posts | Scattered Functional Thoughts
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
jsbible.com
Latest Posts | jsbible.com
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
1riz.com
Projects | 1riz
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
cracklogic.com
Cracklogic - Learn Something New
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
simonlegg.com
Long, Winding Code
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
thebarefootdev.com
@thebarefootdev – Musings on all things software
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
simoexpo.dev
Home | simoexpo.dev
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
abdel.me
Home | Abdel
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
lovesegfault.com
null pointer
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
the0show.com
the0show
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
100daysposter.com
100 DAYS POSTER
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
luizsol.com
Luiz Sol – Unlearning something every day
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
2dgarden.com
2D-Garden
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
brunoabrantes.com
Bruno writes software
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
hobbycode.dev
Hobby Code
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
acodersjourney.com
A CODERS JOURNEY - Life lessons from a coder
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
fromanegg.com
From An Egg
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
rebekahquackenbush.com
Dan's Shorts
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.