Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to shoestringsoftware.net

Shoestring Software · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
85match
shoestringsoftware.com
Shoestring Software
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
gbesoftware.com
GBE Software
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
sunrisesoftware.dev
Sunrise Software
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
distrixsoftwarefactory.org
DistriX Software Factory
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
distrixsoftwarefactory.com
DistriX Software Factory
2 shared topicsweb-development
69match
odnix.com
odnix - on software
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
wwsoftwares.com.br 🇧🇷
WWSoftware's
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
andythelam.com
Andy | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
nuviosoftware.co.uk 🇬🇧
Nuvio Software Solutions
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
andreiamza.dev
Portfolio — Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
disaa.dev
San Contreras - Software Engineering Student
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
congq.com
Q Cong - Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
etsub.com
Etsub - Software Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
gamerrishad.com
Rishad | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
hersitech.com
Hersi — Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
moe-na.com
Software Engineer Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
mohammadsultan.com
Software Engineer Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
67match
kodril.com
Kodril - Software Engineering with Intent
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.