Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to sheetsj.com

Uncommented Bytes · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
commentari.dev
Commentari
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
bavarian.dev
Home - Mohammad Bavarian
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
commitsandcoffee.com
Commits & Coffee
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
mytechblog.co.uk 🇬🇧
My Tech Blog - Adventures in tech documented
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
anydata.co.uk 🇬🇧
Fred Youhanaie | Blog posts and project notes.
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
anydata.uk 🇬🇧
Fred Youhanaie | Blog posts and project notes.
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
dimatosaurus.com
dimatosaurus
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
directedignorance.com
Directed Ignorance
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
gauravm.dev
Gaurav Malviya - .NET Development, Simplified - GauravM - Home
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
commandapi.dev
CommandAPI
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
maccgenics.com
MaccGenics – Tech Blog by Maximus
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
commonsware.com
CommonsWare
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
commonswear.com
CommonsWare
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
iwanttobeinmars.com
Maky
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
anuragnotes.com
Anurag Notes
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
swarnimarun.com
Swarnim Arun | Personal Blog
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
andreadito.com
Andrea Dito — Notes
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
62match
dilsayar.com
Dilsayar - Language & Technology Experiments
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.