Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to shawpub.com

Home - WaterBrook & Multnomah and Ink & Willow · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
85match
shawbooks.com
Home - WaterBrook & Multnomah and Ink & Willow
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
65match
itntranslation.com
Home - Way With Words
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
64match
andreasusanglass.com
Home - Andrea Susan Glass
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
64match
europesparliament.com
Home - John Harper Publishing
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
64match
howtheeuworks.co.uk 🇬🇧
Home - John Harper Publishing
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
63match
european-world.com
Home - European World
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
63match
plsbookworks.com
Home - PLS Bookworks
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
63match
calgaryauthors.com
Home - Calgary Authors
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
63match
knopfdoubleday.com
Home - Knopf Doubleday
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
63match
madcaveshop.com
Home - Mad Cave Studios
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
63match
madcavestudios.com
Home - Mad Cave Studios
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
63match
moissanitepress.com
Home - Moissanite Press
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
63match
monasteria-press.com
Home - Monasteria Press
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
63match
shareyourstory.com
Home - Share Your Story
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
63match
shbookpub.com
HOME - STACKHOUSE BOOK PUBLICATIONS LLC
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
63match
shelfpotential.com
Home - Shelf Potential
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
63match
antimpublication.com
Home - Antim Publication
2 shared topicspublishing-industry
63match
1staudiobook.com
Home - First Audiobooks Limited
2 shared topicspublishing-industry

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.