Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to shawa.dev

Mahmoud Shawa's Portfolio · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
76match
gauravganju.com
GG's portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
76match
andreaprotani.com
Andrea's Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
75match
portfolio-apena.com
Adriano Peña's Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
75match
itsamoghgr.com
Amogh's Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
75match
ivanleekaikiat.com
Ivan's Portfolio!
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
75match
svraj.com
Suraj's Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
75match
monzerdev.com
Monzer's Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
74match
andyathsid.com
andyathsid's portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
71match
mohamedhiba.com
Mohamed Hiba | ML Systems Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
71match
geetheswar.dev
Geetheswar V - Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
71match
andres-exp.com
Andres Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
70match
anjelikas-portfolio.com
Anjelika's Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
70match
ethanchenlu.com
Ethan | Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
70match
knowmywork.app
AI Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
70match
estercinelli.com
Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
70match
konidalaraju.com
Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
70match
dixonloke.com
Dixon's Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
70match
ishramesh.com
Ish Ramesh | Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.