Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to sharpdef.com

#Def - By David Torres · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
riley-davis.com
Riley Davis
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
abundantsalmon.com
David Hang
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
itmustbecode.com
It Must Be Code! - Verses and rants on Power Platform development by David Rivard
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
idealsolutions.co.uk 🇬🇧
David Mills
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
bauerdavid.com
David Bauer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
conordavidson.com
Conor Davidson · Projects
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
monkeydg.com
David Gallo / Monkeydg
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
apibydesign.com
API by Design
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
herebedaemons.com
Samuel Davis
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
kolislab.com
kolislab
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
cam-davis.com
Cameron Davis
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
gametorrahod.com
Game Torrahod
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
pizzaisdavid.com
pizzaisdavid - personal blog
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
gary-davis.com
Gary Davis · Product Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
mockra.com
David Ratajczak | David Ratajczak — engineer at GitHub, based in Sacramento.
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
angelikdevrel.com
Angelik Laboy Torres - Technical Content Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
reubendavern.com
Reuben Davern
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
dinoglue.dev
DinoGlue by Dino3Harris
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.