Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to sharoof.com

Sharoof · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
shartechs.com
Shartechs
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
sharonora.com
Sharon Ora Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
68match
sharongomez.com
Sharon Gomez
1 shared topicsweb-development
67match
sharayabaker.com
Sharaya Baker
1 shared topicsweb-development
67match
hgabriel.dev
Hiram Gabriel — Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
67match
aarooshi.com
Aarooshi
1 shared topicsweb-development
66match
caiomelo.com
Caio's Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
66match
surajcodes.dev
Suraj Sharma | Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
66match
rezahexe.com
Rezah Maharoof | Cybersecurity & Web Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
66match
itshaseeb.com
Haseeb Ahmed - Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
66match
sharadindudas.com
Sharadindu Das
1 shared topicsweb-development
66match
calebdorris.com
CDorris // Web Applications Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
66match
dilaxsongunasegaran.com
Dilaxson Gunasegaran — Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
66match
gauravsharankumar.com
Gaurav Sharan Kumar
1 shared topicsweb-development
66match
planetharold.com
Harold Rodriguez - Web App Developer - PlanetHarold
1 shared topicsweb-development
66match
ricardogranja.com
Ricardo Granja | Full Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
66match
abdallahsabri.com
Abdallah Sabri — Senior Software Engineer & Founding Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
66match
bbastian.dev
Bastian – Full-Stack Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.