Piperic
similar sites
‹ profileTools

Sites similar to shareddev.com

Shared Software Development · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
81match
mogasoft.com
Software Development
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
81match
digitalconnect.id 🇮🇩
Software Development
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
80match
disoftwaredevelopment.com
DI Software Development
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
79match
sherpasoftwaredevelopment.com
Sherpa Software Development
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
78match
kokus.ai
Kokus - Software Development
2 shared topicsweb-development
78match
andyivanov.com
OgiSys - Software Development
2 shared topicsweb-development
78match
ivanovibg.com
OgiSys - Software Development
2 shared topicsweb-development
78match
lyxtep.com
Lyxtep - Software Development
2 shared topicsweb-development
78match
pletza.com
Pletza | Software Development
2 shared topicsweb-development
78match
suotam.com
Suotam | Software Development
2 shared topicsweb-development
78match
plumelo.com
Plumelo | Software Development
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
77match
comparat.com
COMPARAT - Software Development
2 shared topicsweb-development
77match
kodarn.com
Kodarn – Software Development
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
77match
machcode.dev
Machcode - Software Development
2 shared topicsweb-development
77match
pointlabsoftwares.com
Software Development Company
2 shared topicsweb-development
77match
complento.com
Complento - Software Development
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
77match
itcust.com
ITCust UG - Software Development
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
77match
kodehubke.com
KodeHub — Software Development
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.