Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to shared-data.org

Data sharing solutions for publicly funded research · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
catbasepublishingsystems.uk 🇬🇧
Catbase - The Database Publishing Solution
1 shared topicsdatabases
67match
discindodata.com
Discindo Data Solutions
1 shared topicsdatabases
67match
datalika.co.uk 🇬🇧
Datalika - Data Solutions
1 shared topicsdatabases
67match
knovatics.com
Knovatic Solutions – Data Science Engineering
1 shared topicsdatabases
67match
history-db.com
Databases for history research
1 shared topicsdatabases
66match
lancashiredatasolutions.co.uk 🇬🇧
About Us - Lancashire Data Solutions Ltd
1 shared topicsdatabases
66match
isat-solutions.com
ISAT Solutions Inc
1 shared topicsdatabases
66match
ocrdatasolutions.com
OCR Data Solutions – Making big data visible
1 shared topicsdatabases
66match
aniccadata.com
Home | Anicca Data Science Solutions
1 shared topicsdatabases
66match
helixdatasolutions.com
Helix Data Solutions – Data Analytics
1 shared topicsdatabases
66match
supremedatasolutions.com
Supreme Data Solutions | Information Delivered
1 shared topicsdatabases
66match
highcoastdatabasesolutions.com
High Coast Database Solutions AB
1 shared topicsdatabases
66match
hoosierbi.com
Hoosier BI – Pro Bono Data Solutions in Indiana
1 shared topicsdatabases
66match
isaroth.com
Isaroth Solutions
1 shared topicsdatabases
66match
pk-data-solutions.com
Home - Przemysław Kępka - PK Data Solutions
1 shared topicsdatabases
66match
researchdatalabs.com
Research Data Labs
1 shared topicsdatabases
66match
resourcefuldata.com
FileMaker Databases By Hickam Data Solutions
1 shared topicsdatabases
66match
gdbsi.com
Global DB Solutions
1 shared topicsdatabases

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.