Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to sharealist.com

Share a List · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
64match
calltoactionlist.com
Call to Action List
1 shared topicsproductivity
64match
isitonthelist.com
Is it on the list? — IIOTL
1 shared topicsproductivity
64match
anotepad.com
Online Notepad - Take Notes and Share Notes Online
1 shared topicsproductivity
64match
itsdeck.com
deck. - A link, not a file.
1 shared topicsproductivity
63match
sharijryan.com
Shari J. Ryan
1 shared topicsproductivity
63match
plannerue.com
Plannerue - Simple To-Do Lists and Reminders
1 shared topicsproductivity
63match
shareurwork.com
Share Your Work - The portfolio + proof hub for creative teams
1 shared topicsproductivity
63match
retrotool.io
RetroTool | Your online retrospective made easy
1 shared topicsproductivity
63match
sharpcutai.com
Sharpcut — Complete Questionnaires in Minutes
1 shared topicsproductivity
63match
reuselists.com
Reusable Checklists | Reuse Lists
1 shared topicsproductivity
63match
esc-virtual.com
Escritório Virtual
1 shared topicsproductivity
62match
isignfree.com
iSignFree - Collaborative PDF Signing, Free Forever
1 shared topicsproductivity
62match
estimategalore.com
Estimate Galore
1 shared topicsproductivity
62match
estimati.io
Estimati - Planning Poker for Agile Teams
1 shared topicsproductivity
62match
gamergob.com
Join Waiting List | Unproductive Labs
1 shared topicsproductivity
62match
shiffyapp.com
Shiffy - Schedule in a Shiffy
1 shared topicsproductivity
62match
calculete.com
Calculete
1 shared topicsproductivity
62match
hexagontaskmanager.com
Hexagon – Your Productivity Command Center
1 shared topicsproductivity

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.