Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to shanewade.dev

Shane Wade · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
0xjuanma.com
Juanma Roca - Software Engineer
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
lvtran.com
Long Tran
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
ishandubey.com
Ishan Dubey
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
antongeneralov.com
Anton Generalov | Software Engineer
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
shivanggulati.com
Shivang Gulati | Portfolio
3 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
gardion.dev
Dio — Portfolio
3 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
dineshcx.com
Dinesh Choudhary
3 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
hetpatel.dev
Het Patel - Software Engineer
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
kodaicode.com
KodaiCode - Where Code Meets Arcane Logic
3 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
63match
shishirsandeep.com
Shishir Sandeep | Senior Software Engineer & AI Builder
3 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
kouji.dev
Driss Najih — Senior Software Engineer · AI-Driven Apps
3 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
nyverrasystems.com
Nyverra Systems
3 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
62match
henrybaror.com
Henry Bar-Or
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
mohossy.com
Mo Shirmohammadi | Software Engineer Portfolio
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
heura.io
heura.io · GitHub
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
nuvineer.com
Nuvineer
3 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
62match
nuvineer.ai
Nuvineer
3 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
62match
platformforge.ai
PlatformForge
3 shared topicsartificial-intelligence

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.