Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to shanesullivan.com

Shane is underthinking life, work, and more | Substack · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
shapingopinion.com
Shaping Opinion | Substack
1 shared topicspolitics
71match
podgecaste.com
Podgecaste Brazil | Substack
1 shared topicspolitics
70match
conspiracynomore.com
Conspiracy No More | Lawrence Druce | Substack
1 shared topicspolitics
70match
itskamalatime.com
It's Kamala Time! | TR | Substack
1 shared topicspolitics
70match
disinfology.com
Disinfology | Aleksander Iversen | Substack
1 shared topicspolitics
70match
hennessysview.com
Hennessy's View | Substack
1 shared topicspolitics
70match
obsoletedogma.com
Obsolete Dogma | Matt O'Brien | Substack
1 shared topicspolitics
70match
revealedeye.com
RevealedEye | Substack
1 shared topicspolitics
70match
batuage.com
Batuage | Siba | Substack
1 shared topicspolitics
70match
directleft.com
Direct Left | Substack
1 shared topicspolitics
70match
esotericish.com
K.G. | Kyle Griesinger | Substack
1 shared topicspolitics
70match
beaconofcivitas.com
Beacon of Civitas | Substack
1 shared topicspolitics
70match
bearandbison.com
Bear & Bison | Substack
1 shared topicspolitics
69match
anindependentopinion.com
An Independent Opinion | Gary Russon | Substack
1 shared topicspolitics
69match
rickelkin.com
RickElkin.com | Substack
1 shared topicspolitics
69match
conwebwatch.com
ConWebWatch | Terry Krepel | Substack
1 shared topicspolitics
69match
israelbalderas.com
BEYOND THE TALKING POINTS | Israel Balderas | Substack
1 shared topicspolitics
69match
reynolds.com
Reynolds | Substack
1 shared topicspolitics

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.