Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to shanejames.dev

Shane James · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
76match
shanejarvie.com
Shane Jarvie
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
71match
shanesookhan.com
Shane Sookhan
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
70match
shanecairns.com
Shane Cairns
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
69match
shanebarakat.com
Shane Barakat
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
69match
shanesarin.com
Shane Sarin | Shane
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
68match
shaneandersen.com
Shane Andersen
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
68match
shanehalloran.com
Shane Halloran
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
68match
cardiacrhythmanalytics.co.uk 🇬🇧
Dr James Howard
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
shanefirek.com
Shane Firek — GTM Engineer
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
shanirshad.com
shan irshad
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
rhodes-j.com
James Rhodes
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
shane-szarapka.com
Shane Szarapka | Solutions Engineer
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
dingjames.com
James Ding – AI Engineer
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
eshankumar.com
Eshan Kumar
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
8skyai.com
8Sky AI
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
shaneaustrie.com
Home - Shane Austrie's Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
shangalabs.com
Shanga Labs
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
shanesponagle.com
Shane Sponagle — AI & MarTech Transformation Executive
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.