Piperic
similar sites
‹ profileTools

Sites similar to setragames.com

SETRA GAMES — Indie Game Studio · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
86match
isopodgames.com
Isopod Games — Indie Game Studio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
83match
gamerots.com
GameRots — Indie Game Studio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
81match
aniboro.com
Aniboro — Indie Game Studio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
81match
antebellumdigitalsoftwares.com
AD Softwares — Indie Game Studio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
79match
pixelagain.com
Pixel Again — Indie Game Studio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
79match
4xtap.com
4XTap | Indie Game Studio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
79match
gamesingrains.com
Games in Grains – Indie Game Studio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
79match
pixelzgames.com
Pixelz Games | Indie Game Studio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
79match
supergeckogames.com
Super Gecko Games — Indie Studio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
78match
swabbiegames.com
SwabbieGames - Indie Game Studio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
78match
gantics.com
Gantics — Indie Games & Software Studio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
78match
pogopixel.com
PogoPixel | Indie Game Studio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
78match
jabbieworld.com
JabbieWorld – Indie Game Studio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
77match
lycianforge.com
Lycian Forge - Indie Game Studio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
77match
madgoblingames.com
Mad Goblin Games - Indie Game Studio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
77match
dizon.dev
dizon.dev | Indie Game Studio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
77match
shinobytes.com
Shinobytes – Indie Game Studio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming
77match
baumangames.com
Bauman Games — Independent Game Studio
1 shared topicsvideo-gaming

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.