Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to serienlighting.de

Serien Lighting Design and Architectural Lighting · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
100match
serien-lighting.de 🇩🇪
Serien Lighting Design and Architectural Lighting
1 shared topicsdesign
73match
studio-rgb.de 🇩🇪
rgb | lighting design and technical planning
1 shared topicsdesign
71match
proportions.de 🇩🇪
Proportion and Architecture
1 shared topicsdesign
69match
ad-hongkong.com
ARCHITECTURAL DEVICES
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
philippmainzer.com
PHILIPP MAINZER | Office for architecture and design
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
art-de-lux.com
ART DE LUX – architecture + design
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
panik-hotel.de 🇩🇪
Andreas Heller Architects & Designers
1 shared topicsdesign
68match
panikhotel.de 🇩🇪
Andreas Heller Architects & Designers
1 shared topicsdesign
67match
acribia.net
acribia | ARCHITEKTUR & DESIGN
1 shared topicsdesign
67match
nelsonartz.com
Nelson Artz | Brand Architect
1 shared topicsdesign
67match
fakt-office.com
FAKT – Office for Architecture
1 shared topicsdesign
67match
faktoffice.com
FAKT – Office for Architecture
1 shared topicsdesign
67match
rhybuy.com
Scalabel Design & Information Architecture – Scalabel Design
1 shared topicsdesign
67match
baha-architects.com
BAHA Architects – Innovative Architektur und Design
1 shared topicsdesign
67match
reduce-hd.de 🇩🇪
reduce | branding architecture
1 shared topicsdesign
67match
scholzplusdesign.de 🇩🇪
scholzplusdesign.com – ingenious design & architecture
1 shared topicsdesign
67match
studioyonder.de 🇩🇪
Yonder — Architektur und Design
1 shared topicsdesign
67match
red-dot21.de 🇩🇪
Red Dot Design Award
1 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.