Piperic
similar sites
‹ profileTools

Sites similar to seedcom.de

Home - Crea Union GmbH · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
itnovation.com
ITNovation GmbH
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
momatec.com
Home - Almo Consult GmbH
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
resolix.com
Home - WiriTec GmbH
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
shanet.com
Home - SoftCom GmbH
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
moneymeets.com
Home - moneymeets
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
moneymeets.dev
Home - moneymeets
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
data.at 🇦🇹
Home - D.A.T.A.
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
koenig-trading.com
Home - König-Trading
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
ivy-vision.com
IVY VISION GmbH - Home
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
itsparrow.com
Home - ITSparrow
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
4b-software.com
Home - 4b ERP-Software
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
component-software.at 🇦🇹
Home - Component Software GmbH
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
coresection.ch 🇨🇭
Coresection GmbH - Softwareunternehmen in Zürich
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
trauerdruck-app.de 🇩🇪
Home - Trauerdruck App
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
compoundroid.com
Home - DatenBerg
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
dr-solutions.at 🇦🇹
Home - dr-solutions
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
adro-automation.ch 🇨🇭
ADRO Automation GmbH
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
timetask.de 🇩🇪
Home - timetask:smartsupport for smartbusiness
1 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.