similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to security-desaster.com

Security Desaster alternatives & similar sites

Kai Viehmeier Consulting - Security Desaster Blog — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Information And Network Security →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
awareness-portal.com ↗	91 match 1 shared topics	Kai Viehmeier Consulting	de	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hvs-consulting.de ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Cyber Security Consulting \| HvS-Consulting	DE de	information-and-network-security Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
azzet-consulting.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Azzet Consulting - Ihr Partner für Cyber Security und IT-Management	de	information-and-network-security Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cybersicherheit.jetzt ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Start - Dettweiler Consulting	de	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
daseq.org ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	DASEQ GmbH - Cybersecurity, Consulting, Training	de	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
syscentris.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	syscentris – IT Security & Consulting	de	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	partial · 8
cyber-security.versicherung ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	IT-Sicherheit - Mivisio - Cyber Security und Versicherungen	de	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
insidesecurity.de ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Inside Security GmbH	DE de	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
inside-security.de ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Inside Security GmbH	DE de	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cyberark.cologne ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	GCON GmbH - IT Consulting, Management & Security Sevices	de	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ip-video-surveillance.de ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	ip@vision consulting - Unternehmensberatung	DE de	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ip-video.de ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	ip@vision consulting - Unternehmensberatung	DE de	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ip-vision.de ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	ip@vision consulting - Unternehmensberatung	DE de	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
native-security.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	IT Security	de	information-and-network-security Joomla	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
denkena-consulting.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Denkena Consulting	de	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
data-protection.international ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	intersoft consulting services AG \| Experten für Datenschutz & IT	de	information-and-network-security WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	email phone	none
internal-investigations.de ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	intersoft consulting services AG \| Experten für Datenschutz & IT	DE de	information-and-network-security WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	email phone	none
internal-investigation.de ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	intersoft consulting services AG \| Experten für Datenschutz & IT	DE de	information-and-network-security WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	email phone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.