Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to sebcodes.de

sebcodes » Sebastian Kiefer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
65match
sebastian-dernbach.de 🇩🇪
Sebastian Dernbach - Web & App Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
64match
productmonkey.de 🇩🇪
conceptMonkey | Product & Innovation Services – Sebastian Benderoth
1 shared topicsweb-development
64match
schmidtteam.de 🇩🇪
WordPress › Setup-Konfigurationsdatei
1 shared topicsweb-development
64match
pi-io.com
ONDICS GmbH, Esslingen » Domain-Parkplatz
1 shared topicsweb-development
64match
36-fragen.com
WordPress › Fehler
1 shared topicsweb-development
63match
refuseclub.de 🇩🇪
Homepage | Christian Dechant
1 shared topicsweb-development
62match
armincodes.com
armin|codes - Full-Stack Webentwickler Symfony & React
1 shared topicsweb-development
62match
rezepte-teilen.de 🇩🇪
Christian Dengel - Softwareentwickler, Security Enthusiast
1 shared topicsweb-development
62match
code-b.com
Code-B
1 shared topicsweb-development
61match
codecatapult.com
codecatapult
1 shared topicsweb-development
61match
codemodog.com
Codemodog e.U
1 shared topicsweb-development
61match
codemonauts.com
codemonauts
1 shared topicsweb-development
61match
purplecode.de 🇩🇪
Purple Code
1 shared topicsweb-development
61match
code-kontor.com
Code-Kontor GmbH
1 shared topicsweb-development
61match
codekontor.io
Code-Kontor GmbH
1 shared topicsweb-development
61match
thechaoscoder.com
thechaoscoder.com - ich bringe Ordnung in ihre Codebase
1 shared topicsweb-development
61match
codebalance.com
Code Balance GmbH - Webentwicklung, SEO Betreuung, Digitalisierung
1 shared topicsweb-development
61match
code-builder.com
Code Builder - Homepage
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.