similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to sciencepublishinggroup.com

Sciencepublishinggroup alternatives & similar sites

Science Publishing Group: an International Academic Publisher — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Publishing Industry →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
deolububbleintl.com ↗	76 match 1 shared topics	Home - dBi / International Digital Publishing Group	en	publishing-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aiac.org.au ↗	75 match 1 shared topics	AUSTRALIAN INTERNATIONAL ACADEMIC CENTRE PTY. LTD.	AU en	publishing-industry Joomla J2Store	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
actascientific.com ↗	75 match 1 shared topics	Acta Scientific \| International Open Library \| Journals Publishing Group	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
acascipub.com ↗	74 match 1 shared topics	Academic and Scientific Publishing	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
academicpublishings.com ↗	74 match 1 shared topics	Academic Publishing -	en	publishing-industry WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
urregplan.com ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	Journal Home:: Urban and Regional Planning:: Science Publishing Group	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
acaisyst.com ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	Journal Home:: Automation, Control and Intelligent Systems:: Science Publishing Group	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sangathya.com ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	Academic Journal Publisher, Peer Review Research Publishing	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
syncsci.com ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	SyncSci Publishing \| Academic Articles	en	publishing-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
jobaed.com ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	Journal Home:: Journal of Business and Economic Development:: Science Publishing Group	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
luminouspublishers.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Luminus International Publishers - Your Global Publishing Partner \| Luminus International Publishers	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
360scholar.org ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	360Scholar \| International Open-Access Scholarly Publishing	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
csejournal.org ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Journal Home:: Control Science and Engineering:: Science Publishing Group	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
joeanr.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Journal Home:: Journal of Energy and Natural Resources:: Science Publishing Group	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
abptt.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	ABP Through Train - Academic Publishing	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
johnfroy.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Roy Publishing Group	US~ en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
academiainsight.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Academia Publishing Group	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
academicpaperworld.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Anfo Publication House \| Academic Publishing Excellence	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.