similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to scienceforwizards.com

Scienceforwizards alternatives & similar sites

Science for Wizards – science activities for harry potter fans – because sometimes science can seem like magic — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Science →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
hanniverse.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	The Kinematic Hanniverse – Science and art – some might say scienart-a	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
academy-science.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Academy Science Practical Science Products - Academy Science	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cybertrackerblog.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Tracking Science \| Towards Greater Inclusivity in Science	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
samanthagouldson.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Science, simply – Science doesn't have to be difficult!	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
7science.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	7Science — Something Scientific Is Coming	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
4earthscience.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	4EarthScience -- Search Engine for Earth Science Information	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nakedscientist.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Naked Scientists Online, Science Podcast and Science Radio Show	en	science Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 7
samvangele.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Samuel Van Gele – Science Society Blog	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
3ratsinalabcoat.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	THREE RATS IN A LAB COAT – Come for the science writing, stay for the silly graphs.	en	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
joerojasburke.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	joe rojas-burke – science writer	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bardhamansciencecentre.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Bardhaman Science Centre – COMMUNICATING SCIENCE SINCE 1994	en	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
3mbed.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	3MBED – Science Communication & Design for Biotech and Research	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
acitizensciencelife.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	A Citizen Science Life - Engaging with science in every day life	en	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
decolonizeallthescience.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Decolonize ALL The Science \| An Anti-colonial HASTS/Public Science Communication Site	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
discoveryctr.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	PCDC- STEM Programs and Activities for children – Learn and Grow while having fun. Hands On Science Afterschool Programs, Science and Tech Fair, Acting and Drama, Special Events.	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
fatchirp.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	FatChirp early version – Science lessons	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
4loveandscience.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	4Love and Science - 4Love+Science	en	science Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
zyntholab.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	ZynthoLab — Science Made Possible	en	science Spree Commerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.