Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to saskiahowe.com

Saskiahowe alternatives & similar sites

Saskia Howe – Digitale Transformation & Design Thinking — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Management Consulting Industry →

DomainMatchTitleCountry/LangCategoryAI filesContactAI-protection
der-digitalisierungs.coach 72 match
2 shared topics
Digitale Transformation mit Begeisterung und Neugier gestalten - Der Digitalisierungscoach de management-consulting-industryWordPress robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
kasparconsulting.de 68 match
2 shared topics
Executive Coaching & Transformation Consulting - Kaspar Consulting DE de executive-leadership-and-management robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
polz-team.com 67 match
2 shared topics
Führungs & Unternehmenstransformation mit Team-Polz: de executive-leadership-and-managementWordPress robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
polzteam.com 67 match
2 shared topics
Führungs & Unternehmenstransformation mit Team-Polz: de executive-leadership-and-managementWordPress robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
hainz-training.de 67 match
2 shared topics
HAiNZ Consulting - Beratung - Training - Design Thinking DE de management-consulting-industryWordPress robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
hainzconsulting.de 67 match
2 shared topics
HAiNZ Consulting - Beratung - Training - Design Thinking DE de management-consulting-industryWordPress robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
network-thinking.com 67 match
2 shared topics
Ulrich Weinberg – Network Thinking de management-consulting-industry robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
network-thinking.net 67 match
2 shared topics
Ulrich Weinberg – Network Thinking de management-consulting-industry robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
network-thinking.org 67 match
2 shared topics
Ulrich Weinberg – Network Thinking de management-consulting-industry robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
netzwerk-denken.com 67 match
2 shared topics
Ulrich Weinberg – Network Thinking de management-consulting-industry robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
tacitp.com 67 match
2 shared topics
tacit p | TRANSFORMATION AND COACHING IN TIME de management-consulting-industryWordPressWooCommerce robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
hdd-model.de 66 match
2 shared topics
HOME – Human Decision Design DE de management-consulting-industryWordPressWooCommerce robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
we-consulting.at 66 match
2 shared topics
Interim Executive | Improvement. Transformation. Excellence. AT de executive-leadership-and-managementWordPressWooCommerce robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
exploration.at 66 match
2 shared topics
Exploration - Startseite AT de management-consulting-industryWordPress robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
joumanakubiak.com 66 match
2 shared topics
intochange.de – Führungskräfte-Entwicklung und Transformationsbegleitung de executive-leadership-and-managementWordPressWooCommerce robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
avioniq-engineering.com 66 match
2 shared topics
AvioniQ Engineering – Interim CTO/COO/CRO/PM | Restrukturierung & Transformation (Aerospace · Defense · Renewables) DE~ de executive-leadership-and-managementSpree Commerce robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
inclusive-leadership.de 65 match
2 shared topics
wetransform | Systemische Organisationsberatung und Coaching - Wirksamer verändern: Systemische Organisationsberatung und sensible Transformationsbegleitung DE de management-consulting-industryWix robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
alfredschierer.at 65 match
2 shared topics
Coaching, Organisationsberatung, Mediation | Alfred Schierer AT de management-consulting-industryWordPress robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.