Piperic
similar sites
‹ profileTools

Sites similar to sarahstone.dev

Sarah Stone - Developer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
73match
annacodes2.com
Anna - Developer Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
71match
garethroll.com
Gareth Roll - Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
bassamassaf.com
Bassam Assaf - Developer & Creator
2 shared topicsweb-development
71match
eseqkf.com
ESEQKF - Developer Tools
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
itspolar.dev
polar • developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
71match
etsub.com
Etsub - Software Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
kooijmanbart.com
Bart Kooijman - Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
ishaankataria.com
Ishaan Kataria | Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
sherertz.com
Ben Sherertz - Full Stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
mohammadalhussain.com
Mohammad — Full-Stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
rhafael.dev
Rhafael · Full-Stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
suraniharsh.com
Surani - A Full Stack developer.
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
mabdulai.dev
Mohammed - Fullstack Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
moizhassan.dev
Moiz Hassan | Full Stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
nurudin.dev
Nurudin - Developer Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
maciejtyra.dev
Maciej Tyra | Full-Stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
70match
pnfdev.com
PNF Dev — Full-Stack Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
shanwain.dev
Shan Wain | Full-Stack Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.