similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to sarahfitzproofwrite.com

Sarahfitzproofwrite alternatives & similar sites

Sarah Fitzgerald – Writing – Copywriting – Editing – Proofreading — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Freelance Writing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
proofreadingworks.co.uk ↗	78 match 1 shared topics	Proofreading Works - Copywriting \| Copy Editing \| Proofreading	GB en	freelance-writing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
copy-proof.co.uk ↗	76 match 1 shared topics	proofreading \| copy editing \| copywriting services	GB en	freelance-writing Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
swanroadediting.com ↗	76 match 1 shared topics	Swan-Road Editing - Copyediting and proofreading services	en	freelance-writing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
german-proofreader.co.uk ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	German Proofreading, Editing and Copywriting Services	GB en	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dreamcoordinationoffice.net ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	German to English Translations, Copy Editing & Proofreading, Writing Services	en	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jonstoller.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Web Prose – Copywriting for Web Experts	en	freelance-writing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
useprompts.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Prompts - Copywriting Guides	en	freelance-writing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
joe-erbentraut.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	joe erbentraut – writing \| editing \| content strategy	en	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
joniaveni.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Professional Proofreading Services, Writing Services and Editing Services	en	freelance-writing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
johnsannaee.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Creative, targeted copywriting, proofreading and editing services in Paris and online.	en	freelance-writing Squarespace Magento	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
the-proofreader.uk ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	The Proofreader UK \| Proofreading, Copy Editing and Text Localisation	GB en	freelance-writing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
joburge.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Jo Burge – copywriter and editor	en	freelance-writing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
joandawson.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Joan Dawson, Writer & Editor \| Research, Writing & Editing Services	en	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
a2zwriting.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Writing & Editing Services	US~ en	freelance-writing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cstprofessionalwriting.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	CST PROFESSIONAL WRITING – CST PROFESSIONAL WRITING	en	freelance-writing Shopify	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sweetmariecreative.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Sweet Marie Creative – Marie Morasco, Copywriting Portfolio	en	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
harpyedits.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Teresa Brown, Copyediting and Proofreading \| Harpy Editorial Services	en	freelance-writing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
curtisecommunications.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Alameda Writing Studio – writing, editing & design	en	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.