Piperic
similar sites
‹ profileTools

Sites similar to sandstads.com

Christian Sandstad — Application Developer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
2ipper.com
2ipper — Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
68match
mohammadalhussain.com
Mohammad — Full-Stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
67match
dilanderegozu.com
Dilan Deregozu — Backend Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
67match
gatlat.com
Gatlat Deng Bum — Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
anhoang.dev
An Hoang — Developer Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
djeukeu.com
Christian Djeukeu
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
pnfdev.com
PNF Dev — Full-Stack Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
anishmehta.dev
Anish — Developer & AI Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
0xraghu.com
0xRaghu - Web3 Developer Relations
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
basmilius.com
Bas Milius — Full-Stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
batureren.com
Batur Eren — Full Stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
confgiuration.com
confgiuration - Free Online Developer Tools
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
ivanrubin.dev
Ivan Rubin — Full-Stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
itspolar.dev
polar • developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
svieira.dev
SV Junior Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
andrewrminion.com
Andrew Minion | Web Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
anirudrarayamajhi.com
AJ Rayamajhi — Full Stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
66match
ismaelrengifo.com
Ismael Rengifo — Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.