Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to sandra-cameron.com

Sandra Cameron alternatives & similar sites

Coaching for leaders | Frankfurt | Sandra Cameron — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Executive Leadership And Management →

DomainMatchTitleCountry/LangCategoryAI filesContactAI-protection
susanluff.com 72 match
1 shared topics
Susan Luff | Executive Coaching for Leaders en executive-leadership-and-managementWordPressWooCommerce robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
suryapartners.com 72 match
1 shared topics
Surya Partners | Executive Coaching for Teams & Leaders en executive-leadership-and-management robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
joinleadercircles.com 72 match
1 shared topics
Business Coaching for Leaders and Teams | Leader Circles en executive-leadership-and-management robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
drkyrstincoaching.com 72 match
1 shared topics
Executive Coaching for Leaders | Dr. Kyrstin Lokkesmoe PhD LPC en executive-leadership-and-management robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
drdaniellemcgraw.com 72 match
1 shared topics
Executive Coaching for Founders and Senior Leaders | Dr. Danielle McGraw en executive-leadership-and-managementWordPressWooCommerce robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
drashleythomas.com 71 match
1 shared topics
Executive Coaching for Women Leaders | Break the Box en executive-leadership-and-managementWordPressWooCommerce robotsllmsaihumans emailphone partial · 8
debrabednarclark.com 71 match
1 shared topics
Executive Coaching for Women Leaders | Debra Bednar-Clark en executive-leadership-and-managementWordPressWooCommerce robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
luma-coaching.com 71 match
1 shared topics
Luma Coaching | Coaching for Business Leaders | Professional Coaching en executive-leadership-and-managementWordPress robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
4aleadership.com 71 match
1 shared topics
Executive coaching for leadership teams & individuals en executive-leadership-and-management robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
zweigleadership.com 71 match
1 shared topics
Zweig Leadership Advisors | Executive Coaching for CEOs en executive-leadership-and-management robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
jonfrank.com 71 match
1 shared topics
Jon Frank – Coaching for Those Who Lead en executive-leadership-and-management robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
abuznadah.com 70 match
1 shared topics
Dr. Wesam Abuznadah, Executive Coaching for Leaders in KSA & GCC en executive-leadership-and-management robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
jocowlin.com 70 match
1 shared topics
Transformational coaching for business leaders - Jo Cowlin en executive-leadership-and-managementWordPress robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
sansnoise.com 70 match
1 shared topics
AI Workshop for Senior Leaders | Sans Noise en executive-leadership-and-management robotsllmsaihumans emailphone partial · 8
joekildunne.com 70 match
1 shared topics
Executive Coaching for Experts & Technical Leaders in Ireland en executive-leadership-and-managementWordPress robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
listeningpartnership.co.uk 70 match
1 shared topics
Coaching for Leaders and Teams // Listening Partnership GB en executive-leadership-and-managementWordPress robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
avalsethi.com 70 match
1 shared topics
Leadership Matters | leadership coaching en executive-leadership-and-managementWix robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
developengineers.com 70 match
1 shared topics
Develop Engineers | Leadership Coaching for Engineers en executive-leadership-and-managementSquarespaceMagento robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.