Piperic
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to samwaitewriter.com

Sam Waite – Writer & Reviewer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
kay-frost.com
kay frost – writer
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
71match
lydiaink.com
Lydia Ink – Writer
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
71match
meganmong.com
Megan Mong, Writer – Writer
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
71match
charliedart.com
Charlie Dart – Writer & Designer
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
71match
bethkander.com
BETH KANDER – Writer, etc.
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
71match
kateyoungwriter.com
Kate L.Young – Writer
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
71match
chelseaboes.com
Chelsea Boes – Writer
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
katiebertola.com
Katie Bertola – writer
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
sam-huber.com
Sam Huber – writer | teacher | editor
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
katherinejbarrett.com
Katherine J Barrett – Writer & Editor
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
pammsmith.com
Pamm Smith – Writer/Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
kattahules.com
Katta Hules – Writer and Bookworm.
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
babblethenbite.com
Babble & Bite – Will Write for Food
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
ericdeanwilson.com
Eric Dean Wilson – Writer | Teacher
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
avabudavari.com
Ava Budavari – Writer/Activist
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
katiejduane.com
katie j. duane – writer / artist / teacher
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
kelseysorge.com
Kelsey Sorge – writer of words and worries
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
pacificnovelproject.com
Pacific Novel Project – Write on.
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.