Piperic
similar sites
‹ profileTools

Sites similar to samuelbits.com

SamuelBits · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
ansamuel.com
Samuel Anzalone
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
shaneboyar.com
Shane Boyar | Software Dev in RVA 🚀
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
macez.dev
Maciej Szczęsny - Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
anjalidevidev.com
Anjali Devi | Python Full Stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
ricardobaquero.com
Ricardo Baquero's site
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
esonpaguia.com
Eson Paguia
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
israelsantiago.com
Israel Santiago — Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
rileydeman.dev
Riley de Man | Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
rileydeman.com
Riley de Man | Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
64match
cameronmaske.com
Coding, testings and startups · Cameron Maske
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
ridbyte.com
RidByte - Tech Blog & Software Development | RidByte
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
anthonydonsereaux.com
Anthony Donsereaux Jr. — Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
bearlycodinglab.com
Bearly Coding Lab - Every Problem Has A Solution
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
composition9.com
Matt Rose
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
camchenry.com
Cam McHenry
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
sunthecoder.com
Sun | Full Stack Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
canadiansoftwaredev.com
Home | Vincent Li
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
shimanti.com
Shimanti
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.