Piperic
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to samscodes.com

samscodes (Samuel Peter) · GitHub · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
samuelreade.com
Samuel Reade
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
69match
rubenchulia.com
rubchume (Rubén Chuliá Mena) · GitHub
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
69match
samuelrolands.com
Samuel Rolands | Data Scientist Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
68match
oh-my-girl.com
mlane (Marcus Lane) · GitHub
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
68match
awesome-ebook-store.com
mlane (Marcus Lane) · GitHub
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
68match
8pik.com
mlane (Marcus Lane) · GitHub
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
68match
samvgarcia.com
Samuel Garcia · Portfolio
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
67match
samuelmgifford.com
Samuel Gifford
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
67match
samuelbeuran-ai.com
Samuel Beuran - Lead AI Engineer
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
samuelyost.com
Samuel Yost
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
samuelb-ai.com
Samuel Beuran - Lead DevOps & AI Engineer
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
samuelsogden.com
| Samuel S. Ogden
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
samuelrince.com
Samuel Rincé
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
samucoding.com
Samuel B. Martins' (Samuka) logbook
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
samproell.io
Samuel Pröll - Homepage
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
samueljwoods.com
Samuel Woods
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
samueltonks.com
Samuel Tonks
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
sanskarbhartia.com
Sanskar Bhartia - Software Engineer & Data Scientist
1 shared topicsartificial-intelligence

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.