Piperic
similar sites
‹ profileTools

Sites similar to samnaka.com

SAMNAKA - Samuel Nakache · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
65match
andrewsamuelsen.com
Andrew Samuelsen / Web developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
65match
garysauvage.com
Gary Sauvage: Développeur Web Freelance
1 shared topicsweb-development
65match
mohsen-raeisi.com
Mohsen Raeisi
1 shared topicsweb-development
64match
swabahadine.com
Swabahadine Abdallah - Senior Dev
1 shared topicsweb-development
64match
anyanwu.dev
Samuel's Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
63match
smtech.id 🇮🇩
Beranda - Smtech
1 shared topicsweb-development
63match
modkachwala.com
Mohammed Kachwala - Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
63match
hemaka.com
HEMAKA - an Innovative Internet Consultancy
1 shared topicsweb-development
63match
odabas.dev
Abdullah Odabas - Senior Web Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
63match
helmerdavila.com
Helmer Davila - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
63match
shmuelleider.com
Portfolio | Shmuel Leider
1 shared topicsweb-development
62match
poetsolodev.com
Poet - Solo Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
62match
shmuldev.com
Shmuel Cohen Protfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
62match
angotbaptiste.com
Baptiste Angot | Développeur Backend & API Designer
1 shared topicsweb-development
62match
pixenjoy.com
Gilles Vauvarin - Développeur Kirby CMS - Montréal, Canada - Home
1 shared topicsweb-development
62match
krautcomputing.com
Manuel Meurer
1 shared topicsweb-development
62match
anshulgera.com
Your Name - Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
62match
hermi.dev
Miguel Hermida
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.