Piperic
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to samkiel.dev

Samuel Ezekiel | Software Engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
84match
samuelrath.com
John Doe | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
82match
sonangga.dev
Angga Maulana | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
82match
byyoussefmaged.com
Youssef Maged | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
82match
samuelbankole.com
Samuel Bankole | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
lwebb.dev
Logan Webb | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
rysuri.com
Ry Suriyathep | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
nrizky.com
NRizky - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
ayushgurung.com
Ayush Gurung - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
mrmallik.com
Gulger Mallik | Software Engineer | Mr Mallik
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
iamaziz.com
Dev.io | Senior Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
ibnshayed.com
Emran | Full Stack Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
mudithperera.com
Mudith Perera | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
berksengul.com
Berk Şengül Personal Website | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
karimaly.dev
Karim Aly - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
novialim.com
Novia Lim | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
iamphduc.dev
Duc Pham - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
sameedrazi.com
Sameed Razi — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
somkene.com
Somkene Ojukwu | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.