Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to samferree.dev

Sam Ferree, Developer/Architect · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
bearded-developer.com
Bearded Developer
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
gamersi.dev
Simon gamersi: Developer
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
ankitlohar.com
Developer Terminal
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
oldfartdeveloper.com
👴🏽 Old fart developer
3 shared topicsweb-development
66match
anishde.dev
Anish De | Fullstack Developer
3 shared topicsweb-development
66match
mahdishokri.com
Mahdi Shokri — .NET Developer
3 shared topicsweb-development
66match
restpen.com
Restpen - Developer's Pool
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
andyhinkle.com
Andy Hinkle | Software Developer
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
knileshh.com
Nilesh Kumar | Backend Developer
3 shared topicsweb-development
66match
cadenlund.com
Caden Lund | Full-Stack Developer
3 shared topicsweb-development
66match
connorvoigt.com
Connor Voigt - Software Developer
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
7-views.com
7-Views - Developers Blog : 7-Views
3 shared topicsweb-development
66match
moreau.dev
Jean Moreau · Full Stack Developer
3 shared topicsweb-development
66match
konyrtai.com
Alibek Konyrtai - Software Developer
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
m3coding.com
Free Online Developer Tools | m3coding
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
shauryasrc.com
Shaurya Choudhary - Software Developer
3 shared topicsweb-development
65match
mojiwa.com
Mo Jiwa | Developer, geek, time traveller
3 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
dima-dev.com
Dima Smolentsev | Full Stack Software Developer
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.