Piperic
similar sites
‹ profileTools

Sites similar to sameedrazi.com

Sameed Razi — Software Engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
82match
andreafuso.dev
Andrea Fuso — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
82match
evanking.dev
Evan King | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
ethanloh.com
Ethan Loh — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
lwebb.dev
Logan Webb | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
dirkdevelops.com
Dirk Knibbe — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
andrewtgionfriddo.com
Andrew Gionfriddo - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
aabdellatif.com
Ahmed Abd El-Latif - Senior Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
camipg.com
Camila Pozas — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
isaxcode.com
Mohammed Isa — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
sharinin.com
Sharini Nirmalan — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
anjukaranji.com
Anju Karanji - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
ethemyeniay.com
Ethem Yeniay - Senior Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
hekdev.com
Erik Kleiman — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
shaunasaunders.com
Shauna Saunders - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
heinsoe.com
Hein Soe | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
ricardofearing.com
Ricardo Fearing - Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
rijinmk.com
Rijin MK — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
reynaud.dev
Filipe Reynaud — Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.