Piperic
similar sites
‹ profileTools

Sites similar to samdoes.dev

Sam Fitz - Software Dev · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
76match
cakenes.com
Cakenes - Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
anshulgera.com
Your Name - Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
hilalabaci.com
Hilal ABACI - Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
hectorruizlaph.com
Hector Ruiz - Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
ankacakan.com
Anka Cakan - Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
apelgrim.com
Apelgrim / Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
georgestan.com
George Stan - Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
shoaibsarwar.com
Shoaib Sarwar - Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
75match
olegpryadko.com
Oleg Pryadko - Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
74match
iwaleednasir.com
Waleed Nasir - Software Developer Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
74match
calincartis.com
Calin Cartis - Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
74match
mohammadousadjo.com
SADJO MOHAMMADOU - Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
74match
ogadar.com
Rodgers Ogada — Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
74match
shibriat.dev
Shibriat Hossain - Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
74match
pangaia-systems.co.uk 🇬🇧
Pangaia Systems - Software Development
1 shared topicsweb-development
73match
mahiruslu.com
Mahir Uslu | Senior Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
73match
mackcore.io
Mack Core | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
73match
antoniobenincasa.com
Antonio Benincasa - Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.