Piperic
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to samcarty.com

Sam Carty | Software Engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
82match
icyvance.com
Isaac Vance | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
80match
errolkeith.com
Errol Keith | Software Engineer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
80match
ayushacharjya.com
Ayush Acharjya | Software Engineer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
80match
ninamason.dev
Nina Mason | Software Engineer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
80match
nuriddinislamov.com
Nuriddin Islamov | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
80match
alejandrobay.com
Alejandro Bay — Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
80match
karimwael.com
Karim Wael | Software Engineer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
80match
royliustudio.com
ROY.DEV | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
80match
osamamirghani.com
Osama Mirghani · Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
80match
deeprua.com
Ewusie Bentil | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
79match
alechsu.com
AlecHsu - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
79match
ephremasnake.com
Ephrem Asnake | Software Engineer | MBA
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
79match
nicolascarrillo.com
Nicolás Carrillo | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
79match
m-to-b.com
Michel Busse | Software Engineer Portfolio
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
78match
akashojha.com
Akash Ojha | Senior Software Engineer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
78match
nicklina.com
Nick Lina - Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development
78match
aganaki.com
Aganaki — Software Engineering
2 shared topicsweb-development
78match
omarfaruqeanik.com
Md. Omar Faruqe Anik | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.