Piperic
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to sambaker.dev

Sam Baker - Web Development Portfolio · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
75match
okenan.dev
Portfolio | Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
73match
sachinsoni.com
Sachin Soni | Personal Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
73match
rustwebdevelopment.com
Rust Web Development
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
73match
i-am-a.dev
Govind Nair - Developer Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
72match
declank.com
Declan Kelly - Full-Stack Web Developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
72match
saumi.dev
Portfolio
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
72match
nukshn.com
Ivan @nukshn - Full-stack Developer Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
72match
samer-baydoun.com
Samer Baydoun's Blog | Web development
2 shared topicsweb-development
72match
sabiyomtov.dev
Sabi Yomtov - Software Developer Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
72match
1benw.com
Ben Walker - Full Stack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
71match
3dime.com
Idriss - Backend Developer Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
71match
dcodes.dev
dcodes.dev | Master web development
2 shared topicsweb-development
71match
samuk.dev
Samuel Klein | Portfolio
2 shared topicsweb-development
71match
rubyrailed.com
Ruby Railed | A freelance web development journey
2 shared topicsweb-development
71match
aakarshtiwari.com
Aakarsh Tiwari - Full Stack Developer Portfolio
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
71match
samirdeveloper.com
Samir Developer - Home
2 shared topicsweb-development
71match
ruipcsantos.com
My Portfolio - Rui Santos
2 shared topicsweb-development
71match
nsolinc.com
Rapid web development with Lucee!
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.