similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to samangi.com

Samangi alternatives & similar sites

Samangi Wadinambiarachchi | Final year PhD Candidate in Human Computer Interaction — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Artificial Intelligence →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
dequnteng.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Dequn Teng — PhD Candidate, University of Cambridge	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
axiomdrift.ai ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Where interaction becomes structure.	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
msaas.co.uk ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Koodoo \| Redefine customer interactions with AI	GB en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
axonbci.ai ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Axonera — AxonBCI: Private, Modular Brain-Computer Interface	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
axonbci.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Axonera — AxonBCI: Private, Modular Brain-Computer Interface	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
harryye.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Harry Ye - Human-AI Interaction Researcher	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
joshliew.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Joshua Liew \| PhD Researcher in Deep Learning & Computer Vision	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
usephonesly.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Voice AI for Businesses \| Boost Leads & Automate Customer Interactions	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
synstatelabs.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Synstate Labs — Human–AI Interaction Engineering	en	artificial-intelligence	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hasinishraq.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Hasin Ishraq - A Final Year Computer Science Student	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
digital-human.info ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Live Avatars - Real-Time AI Avatars for Interactive Human-Machine Experiences	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
digital-humans.info ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Live Avatars - Real-Time AI Avatars for Interactive Human-Machine Experiences	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
demoable.io ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Demoable - AI Interactive Product Demos	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hayoungjeong.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Hayoung Jeong \| PhD Candidate — Digital Phenotypes & Clinical AI	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
abidprojects.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Abid Projects \| Final Year Projects for BTech, MTech & Degree Students	IN~ en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
joeyyip.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Joey Yip - AI Researcher \| Knowledge Graphs, LLMs & Neuro-Symbolic AI \| PhD Candidate USC	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
happyoyster-ai.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Happy Oyster AI World Model - Real-Time World Creation & Interaction	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
lukianets.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Less is More - Neuroscience, Interaction, Design. The blog of Nikita Lukianets	en	artificial-intelligence WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.