similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to salciotti.com

Salciotti alternatives & similar sites

Victor Salciotti, Product Design VP and Leadership Mentor — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Executive Leadership And Management →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
pixeltoprocess.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Pixel to Process \| Product Design Leadership with Impact	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jonathanjenin.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Jonathan Jenin — Founder Advisor & Product Leadership Mentor	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
utdexp.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	United Experience - Design Leadership - UX, Brand, Product	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
uu-v.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	David Vuu — Strategic Product Design Leader	AU~ en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nashatwork.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Product Design Leader	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
catherinegrabar.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Catherine Grabar \| Product Design Leader	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
casperglorius.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Casper Glorius \| Product Leadership	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
playbookalpha.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Private Equity Product Leadership Playbook	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
uxretreat.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	UX Retreat Bali 2026 — Leadership Residency for UX & Product Design Leaders	ID~ en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
carowgatti.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Caroline Williams Gatti - Product + Design Leader	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
joel-livermore.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Joel Livermore \| Product Leadership	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
johnchoquette.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	John Choquette · Product Design Leader	en	executive-leadership-and-management Spree Commerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nathanrohm.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Nathan Rohm - Product Leadership & Innovation Expert	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
ealingdigital.co.uk ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Ealing Digital Ltd – Senior digital product leadership and delivery	GB en	executive-leadership-and-management WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dpd-community.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	DPD Community - Product Leadership Beyond Courses	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hansgooger.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	On Life and Leadership \| Hans Googer \| Substack	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
joemanbeck.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Joe Manbeck — Product Leader	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
swetananda.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Sweta Nanda — Product Leader & Director	en	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.