similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to safeagentguard.com

Safeagentguard alternatives & similar sites

SafeAgentGuard - Open Source AI Agent Security Testing — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Information And Network Security →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
agent-shield.com ↗	73 match 2 shared topics	AI Agent Security Audits \| AgentShield - OWASP LLM Top 10 Testing	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
tragentics.com ↗	73 match 2 shared topics	Tragentics — AI Agent Security Platform	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
agentgrade.net ↗	73 match 2 shared topics	AgentGrade — AI Agent Security Scanner	en	information-and-network-security	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
agentvaultprotocol.org ↗	72 match 2 shared topics	Agent Vault Protocol: Open Standard for AI Agent Security	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cleverpixels.net ↗	72 match 2 shared topics	CogniWatch · AI Agent Security Observatory	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
agentsh.org ↗	72 match 2 shared topics	agentsh \| Agent Shell Security for AI Agents	en	information-and-network-security	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
0eroshot.com ↗	72 match 2 shared topics	ZeroShot — Offensive Security Testing for AI Agents	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
acidtest.dev ↗	71 match 2 shared topics	AcidTest — Security Scanner for AI Agent Skills & MCP Servers	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
agentichardening.ai ↗	71 match 2 shared topics	Agentic Hardening — Curated Agentic AI Security Resources	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
agentprivilege.ai ↗	71 match 2 shared topics	Agent Privilege Lab — AI Agent Security Research	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
clawdit.tech ↗	71 match 2 shared topics	Clawdit - AI Agent Security Audits	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
agenticgate.io ↗	71 match 2 shared topics	Agentic Gate - Enterprise Security for AI Agents	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
agentarmor.org ↗	71 match 2 shared topics	AgentArmor — Security Scanner for AI Agents	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
eaglesfield.ai ↗	71 match 2 shared topics	Eaglesfield Adversarial AI \| LLM Security & AI Safety Testing	GB~ en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
agentmessaging.org ↗	71 match 2 shared topics	Agent Messaging Protocol (AMP) - Secure Messaging for AI Agents \| Open Source	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
clawshield.tech ↗	71 match 2 shared topics	ClawShield — Security Gateway for AI Agents	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
mind-gard.com ↗	71 match 2 shared topics	Mindgard - Automated AI Red Teaming & Security Testing	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mindgard.ai ↗	71 match 2 shared topics	Mindgard - Automated AI Red Teaming & Security Testing	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.